‘Yehewin Aski’: The Breathing Lands Protecting Canada from Climate Breakdown

There is a word the Cree use to describe the vast peatlands that span the Hudson Bay Lowlands in northern Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. Yehewin, meaning “breathing” in Cree, is a fitting description for the bogs, which are vital carbon sinks and key natural assets in the fight against global warming, says Vern Cheechoo, director of lands and resources at the Mushkegowuk Council that represents seven First Nations in northern Ontario.

Vern Cheechoo, director of lands and resources at the Mushkegowuk Council. Over his lifetime, he has seen rapid changes to the ecosystems in northern Ontario, and he says First Nations have had to adjust. Photo courtesy of Vern Cheechoo

The word was used by the elders and stretches back in time, Cheechoo says. “Yehewin is your breathing. The wetlands do the same thing. It’s like the lungs of Mother Earth: it cleans the air, it provides us with freshness, it keeps the Earth cool.”

A research team led by University of Alberta researcher Lorna Harris recently published a paper that scientifically corroborates this long-standing Indigenous knowledge about the importance of peatlands. Her paper argues for the preservation of peatlands as a nature-based solution to help achieve Canada’s 2050 net-zero goal. But these essential carbon sinks are under threat: particularly in Ontario, increased development is leaving Canada’s peatlands vulnerable to destruction, and without more government protection, a vital tool for addressing climate change could become a liability. 

A peatland is a bog, swamp or wetlands composed of ancient soil, some of it over 8,000 years old, and made up of sphagnum moss and decaying vegetation. Peat holds five times more carbon per square hectare than the Amazon rainforest. These ecosystems also provide critical wildlife habitats and potential climate change refuge for species and serve as a natural barrier for worsening forest fires. 

Across Canada, peatlands sit largely on traditional territories of Indigenous nations. The ecosystems serve as hunting grounds, vital for food security, and are culturally important locations for family traplines and ceremonies like Sun Dance for the Cree. 

Canada holds one-quarter to one-third of the world’s peatlands, amounting to the largest peatland carbon stock at 550 billion tonnes. To put that into perspective, global emissions from fossil fuel burning were 35 billion tonnes in 2020. 

The second largest concentration of peatlands in the world is in the Hudson Bay Lowlands.

Canada holds one-quarter to one-third of the world’s peatlands, amounting to the largest peatland carbon stock at 550 billion tonnes. To put that into perspective, global emissions from fossil fuel burning were 35 billion tonnes in 2020. Photo courtesy of Lorna Harris

Harris says these ecosystems are threatened by climate change, which can lead to environmental catastrophes, such as the wildfires that swept through Fort McMurray, Alta., in 2016, where a tree-planting experiment and severe heat waves transformed the peatlands into a tinderbox. Severe permafrost thaw can also drown out peatlands, causing them to collapse, as it has done in the Northwest Territories.

“When we look at historical fires and fire frequency in the Hudson Bay Lowland itself, because the landscape is so wet, the fires are very small and not very frequent,” Harris says. 

Russia, China and the U.K. are awakening to the essential natural functions of these ecosystems and are spending millions to restore their peatlands, Harris says. Yet Canada does not have a strategy to conserve these natural assets.

Large areas of undisturbed peatlands are currently vulnerable to expanding industrial projects, such as the mining development planned in northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire, which will release an estimated 130 to 250 million tonnes of carbon once fully developed, according to Harris’ research. Even on the low end, the development would create emissions equal to more than a seventh of Canada’s overall total emissions each year. That’s on top of large potential disturbances caused by a proposed all-season highway connecting the region to the rest of Ontario. 

The Ring of Fire is setting up a battle between First Nations, who want a larger say in development planning for the region, and provincial and federal governments that want to become global powerhouses in critical minerals for a green economy. 

Indigenous communities have already had disputes with the Ontario government and area mining companies. In 2010, First Nations blockaded airstrips built by mining companies in the region. In contrast, both former premier Kathleen Wynne’s and current Premier Doug Ford’s governments have approached First Nations with a divide-and-conquer strategy, handpicking certain First Nations to work with over others. Ford has also gone so far as to recently repeal sections of the Far North Act, ensuring the construction of the all-season road without the need for environmental assessments and First Nation consultations. Before the amendments, any development without a prior land-use plan would have required careful and collaborative planning. 

The Ring of Fire’s most precious deposits include chromite, an essential mineral in stainless steel, and nickel, which is used in an assortment of batteries —  nickel sulphate, for example, is a key component of electric vechicle batteries. Previous Liberal governments have estimated the monetary value of the Ring of Fire’s minerals at $60 billion, but that number was discredited by a 2019 Globe and Mail investigation that called it “aspirational hogwash.” 

An aerial photo of the Hudson Bay Lowlands. New research echoes long-standing Indigenous knowledge about the importance of carbon-storing peatlands. Photo courtesy of Lorna Harris

There are no firm estimates about the value of the minerals contained in the Ring of Fire, but Toronto-based Noront Resource Ltd., the company that owns most mining concessions in the region, recently sold to an Australian private equity firm for $617 million after a bidding war, signaling that increased development is likely and considered worth the possibly profitable risks.

Cheechoo says the Mushkegowuk Council is not against development per se, but it must protect against adverse effects on the world’s second largest peatland complex. He says the federal government’s environmental assessment of the Ring of Fire doesn’t include the downstream, run-off risks that could damage the peatlands, James Bay and the Arctic Ocean. 

“We need to have a frank discussion about the impacts that can happen in this region,” Cheechoo said. 

Industry leaders take the line that any disturbance to the peatlands can be restored at a rate of $3,500 to $4,000 per hectare. But regaining the same level of carbon storage would take 1,500 years, or 1,469 years after Canada aims to hit its net-zero emissions goal, to return to undisturbed levels, according to Harris. 

All of the carbon released from the peatlands adds to the problem of greenhouse gas emissions, Harris says. “In terms of offset, if you destroy peatlands in one place, the idea is you can create peatlands somewhere else. That doesn’t work in terms of carbon storage.”

Instead of costly peatland regeneration projects that won’t work, Harris’ team advocates for Indigenous Protected Conservation Areas, accurate carbon tracking of the peatlands, especially during development projects, a conservation economy that includes payments to preserve ancient peatlands and policy initiatives based on avoiding disturbances rather than mitigation. 

Cheechoo jokes that First Nations should place a meter on their territories to bill the world for the amount of carbon captured on peatlands. 

“Society doesn’t place a value, or see the value, of what the ecosystem is doing right now,” Harris says. “It’s a shame we can’t put a value on carbon in the correct way; we only see carbon’s value when it’s extracted.”

— With files from Mia Rabson, reporter with the Canadian Press 

The post ‘Yehewin Aski’: The Breathing Lands Protecting Canada from Climate Breakdown appeared first on Nature Canada.

Keeping Birds Safe At Your Feeder

February is one of the coldest months in the Northern hemisphere. By this time, food sources for wild birds have become scarce, buried underneath snow or wilted away until spring. Lower temperatures also mean birds need a lot more food just to maintain their body temperature. Providing food that is high in energy, like sunflower seeds and cracked corn, helps wild birds get through this challenging season. That’s what Feed the Birds Month is all about! 

Over time, it’s become increasingly important to ensure that bird lovers like you are aware of best practices. The goal is to reduce potential harm to birds from feeders, primarily diseases and predators. Here are some tips to get you started. 

Breaking Down Myths: Are Feeders Safe for Birds?

While feeding wildlife is generally discouraged, bird feeders are an exception—birds don’t become dependent on feeders. Instead, birds incorporate feeders into a route that also includes natural resources. As a result, removing a bird feeder wouldn’t have the same impact as it might on wildlife who can become dependent on a particular food source.

1. Placement

  • Bird feeders should not be further than 3.5 meters from cover that provides a route of escape and protection to avoid predation.
  • There should be an unobstructed view around bird feeders so that foraging birds can detect any predators in the area.
  • Any cover that could conceal predators attempting to attack should not be near feeders.
  • Feeders at lower levels should be surrounded by brush or fencing to preclude predator access.
  • Bird feeders should be placed less than one metre or more than 10 metres away from buildings to minimize the risk of window collisions.

Curious about what kind of bird feeder would be best for your garden? Learn more about bird feeder types from our partners at Bird Friendly Peterborough →

Image of birds feeding

2. FOOD AND FEEDER SELECTION AND MAINTENANCE

Use the right feeders the right way. 

  • Good bird feeders are made from plastic, steel or glass as they are easier to clean.
  • Small feeders are best since they do not allow large numbers of birds to congregate, reducing contact rates, and they empty quickly, which prevents seeds from getting wet or spoiled.
  • Feeders should have drainage holes to prevent water from accumulating, and they should also not have sharp points or edges that may cause injury.
  • They should be covered to prevent seeds from getting wet, and they should allow birds to perch away from the food to avoid fecal contamination.
  • Always wear gloves and wash your hands thoroughly after cleaning your feeders.

3. Feed the right food

  • Provide only high-quality birdseed and avoid bargain brands that list “filler” seeds as main ingredients (ex. milo, red millet, oats, rice and wheat). Not only will these seeds be discarded by wild birds, but they will also absorb moisture—promoting spoilage and fungal growth while attracting rodents and other species. 
  • Different bird species prefer different seed types, try to provide a variety whenever possible. Sunflower seeds are the top choice among most birds. Suet is great, but only in the winter months since it goes rancid quickly in the heat. Safflower seeds, nyjer seeds and peanuts are other good choices that will attract a variety of species.
  • Foods that have no nutritional value for birds or should not be fed to them include bread and chocolate.

4. Clean bird feeders and artificial water sources regularly

  • They should be cleaned and disinfected twice a month while in use.
  • Use a scrub brush and hot soapy water to clean debris and bird feces off the feeders.
  • Special attention should be given to the perches and openings where the birds have to place their heads inside to get access to bird feed.
  • After cleaning, they should be disinfected by immersion for two to three minutes in a solution of one part of liquid chlorine bleach and nine parts of warm water, then rinsed with clean water and allowed to air dry.
  • Remove feeders if an outbreak is detected, and consult your CWHC Regional Centre to find out when the danger has passed.

5. And

  • Use visual markers or other means to make your windows visible to birds. Learn more here.
  • Keep domestic cats indoors or outdoors only on a leash or in an enclosure to prevent predation. Learn more here.
  • Surveil the birds at your feeders: this is an important aspect of disease prevention in particular since the possibility of outbreaks is a constant threat. As well as keeping an eye on your backyard birds, listen for alerts from press outlets and management agencies on disease outbreaks.
  • For more information on the signs and symptoms of some of the more common diseases, check out this report from CWHC.

Learn more about how Nature Canada is working towards making cities across the country bird friendly, visit our Bird Friendly City campaign and subscribe for updates to be the first to know about upcoming initiatives.

The post Keeping Birds Safe At Your Feeder appeared first on Nature Canada.

Tech giant pulls drag queen ad after backlash

Samsung apologizes for ‘offensive’ video featuring Muslim mother supporting LGBTQ son

South Korean electronics giant Samsung has pulled an advertisement that featured a real-life Singapore family, in which the hijab-wearing mother expressed her support for her drag-queen son by hugging him.

They were one of four families that appeared in the ad under the slogan “Listen to your Heart,” which was meant to promote Samsung’s new smart watch. The device has a heart-rate monitor and noise-canceling earbuds.

The ad triggered anger online, with some accusing Samsung of trying to promote LGBTQ ideology and being insensitive to the Islamic faith. According to Singapore’s 2020 census, 15.6% of the country’s population identify as Muslim.


READ MORE: Former Russian security agent comes out as trans

Samsung published a statement online on Wednesday, admitting that the production may be perceived as “insensitive and offensive,” adding that they had removed the video from all public platforms.

© Vyla Virus/Instagram, Samsung



The drag queen in the video is known as Vyla Virus and has been described online as one of Singapore’s most prolific drag performers. He has since appeared on his Instagram platform to say the footage was all about a mother’s love and nothing more.

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section

Russia’s ban on crypto: What it means in reality

The country is mulling banning crypto mining and crypto-related transactions via Russian financial services

The Central Bank of Russia issued a report on Thursday in which the regulator proposed to officially prohibit the issuance, circulation, exchange, and trade of cryptocurrencies and stablecoins (tokens linked to fiat currencies), as well as banning the organization of these operations on Russian soil.

  1. What would be the implications of the crypto ban? 
    The ban would effectively mean Russians won’t be able to pay with crypto holdings for any goods, works, or services – not for a cup of coffee, nor for a taxi ride. They also won’t be able to make money transfers in crypto, nor organize a crypto exchange.
  2. Will you go to prison if you don’t comply with the crypto ban?
    No. The regulator has proposed fining firms and individuals that violate the ban.
  3. Does the ban include owning crypto assets?
    If you’re an individual investor, then the answer is no. You can still own crypto, but only as an asset. You won’t be able to use it in Russia, but you will be free to use it abroad. However, it has been proposed that operations with cryptocurrencies in foreign jurisdictions by Russian citizens should be monitored.
  4. Who can’t own crypto assets?
    The regulator has proposed banning all financial enterprises from owning investments in cryptocurrencies or using related financial instruments. The use of Russian financial intermediaries and financial market infrastructure to carry out any operations with cryptocurrencies will also be illegal.
  5. Why does Russia want to ban crypto?
    The Central Bank has been vocal about the threats posed by cryptocurrencies due to transaction anonymity. The regulator has warned crypto is becoming increasingly popular for illegal activities, including fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Moreover, a widespread use of cryptocurrencies could undermine the stability of the ruble, leading to an outflow of capital from the country, the regulator says. Due to the flow of capital from the traditional financial system to the cryptocurrency market, there is a further threat to the financing of the real sector of the economy.
  6. What are the immediate results of the ban?
    As the ban is merely a proposal for now, it has not yet led to any financial consequences. However, as the central bank has outlined, Russian citizens account for a significant share of the global cryptocurrency market. The volume of operations of Russian individuals with cryptocurrencies may reach $5 billion, the report says. Russia is also the globe’s third-largest bitcoin miner, accounting for roughly 11% of its mining volume. While individual crypto-owners would have to merely buy a plane ticket to use their crypto holdings outside Russia (which is also an inconvenience, but a relatively small one), miners would have to spend a lot on moving their activities across the border to some more crypto-friendly state.
  7. What has been the public reaction to the proposed crypto ban?
    As expected, the prospect of a crypto ban has been met with a wave of opposing public opinions. Crypto-enthusiasts state that the central bank’s approach is unprofessional, and that it won’t be able to monitor and prevent all crypto operations in any case. While supporting the idea of crypto regulation – for instance, to pluck out illegal transactions – the community is appalled by the idea that authorities may prohibit activities which are safe and legal. Others, however, say that Russia has a right to defend its national currency.
  8. Could crypto ban be implemented?
    The Central Bank now wants to discuss with the market whether its participants support the proposed crypto ban. But experts have already warned that even if the ban is officially introduced, authorities will have a hard time enforcing it. For instance, the regulator has practically no tools to detect transactions with cryptocurrencies. Experts warn that authorities would have to completely stop all transfers between individuals to limit p2p transactions and payments to crypto exchanges across Russia. An action on such a scale would not be approved, even for the Bank of Russia.
  9. Can Russia stop crypto-mining?
    This situation is also complicated, as most miners in Russia do not use the power of commercial data centers, but instead organize their own sites. “Theoretically, such sites can be identified, but the question is how much it will cost, how expedient it will be. It is impossible to distinguish a mining farm from, for example, a greenhouse remotely – they both consume electricity evenly and around the clock; that is, you will need to gain personal access to every facility,” Dmitry Bederdinov, Data Centers and Cloud Technologies Council CEO, told RBC. Imagine a police officer going from door to door to check whether you mine crypto or grow strawberries.
  10. What are the long-term consequences for Russia?
    Analysts warn that in the event of a ban, the crypto sector in Russia will turn into a huge black market, which might be far worse than even its current unregulated state. Also, the restrictions proposed by the central bank will hardly solve either the problem of money leaving supervision or the growth of crypto investments, especially given that the regulator would allow Russians to own crypto and use it abroad – so much for stalling capital outflows. Overall, the majority of analysts believe that what Russia needs is clear regulation of crypto, not a sweeping ban.

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section

Money flowing out of favorite pandemic-era stocks

Netflix and Peloton shares are poised to lose gains made over the last two years

Stock prices of lockdown-era favorites Netflix and Peloton nosedived on Thursday, in a latest sign that the boom for stay-at-home shares appears to be vanishing.

Peloton shares plunged 24%, wiping off nearly $2.5 billion in market value, after the exercise bike maker’s CEO said it was reviewing the size of its workforce and “resetting” production levels.

Data from S3 Partners shows short-sellers doubled their profits by betting against Peloton in 2021, the third-best returning US short.

Shares in streaming giant Netflix also plummeted nearly 20%, as the company forecast new subscriber growth in the first quarter would be less than half of analysts’ predictions. It also expects to add just 2.5 million users in the current quarter, well short of estimates.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said there were a myriad of reasons for the company’s low guidance, pointing to increased competition as a cause.


READ MORE: Bezos, Zuckerberg & Musk added $115 BILLION to their fortunes during pandemic

The two firms are the latest darlings of 2020 to sink to levels not seen since the early days of the Covid-19 outbreak. Others, such as Zoom video conferencing software and the e-signature company Docusign, have also suffered downward revaluation of their stocks.

“With a return to the office and travel lanes opening, darlings of the WFH (work from home) thematic are reflecting the growing reality that the world is moving slowly but with certainty towards a new normalcy,” Justin Tang, head of Asian research at United First Partners in Singapore, was quoted as saying by Reuters.

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section